<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:georss="http://www.georss.org/georss" xmlns:geo="http://www.w3.org/2003/01/geo/wgs84_pos#" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Spam Words</title>
	<atom:link href="http://alexandersarchive.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/spam-words/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://alexandersarchive.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/spam-words/</link>
	<description>The Modern Great Library</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 17 Oct 2009 05:47:21 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.com/</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: James Lewitzke</title>
		<link>http://alexandersarchive.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/spam-words/#comment-356</link>
		<dc:creator>James Lewitzke</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 22:45:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexandersarchive.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-356</guid>
		<description>Hey John I commented on this post a week or two ago, and it wasn&#039;t published immediately (I had a feeling it wouldn&#039;t), so I was just wondering if you check akismet for those sort of comments or not?

Maybe it was just deleted if you&#039;ve been receiving tons of spam, and didn&#039;t see it amongst the 100s of other spams blogs often get.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hey John I commented on this post a week or two ago, and it wasn&#8217;t published immediately (I had a feeling it wouldn&#8217;t), so I was just wondering if you check akismet for those sort of comments or not?</p>
<p>Maybe it was just deleted if you&#8217;ve been receiving tons of spam, and didn&#8217;t see it amongst the 100s of other spams blogs often get.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Dan</title>
		<link>http://alexandersarchive.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/spam-words/#comment-337</link>
		<dc:creator>Dan</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 11 Apr 2008 14:08:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexandersarchive.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-337</guid>
		<description>I agree with VirtuosiMedia - I&#039;ve seen several different scripts use the Akismet anti-spam API in the past - it&#039;s definitely worth a try. It would be far more advanced than a custom spam filter that spammers would find a way around no doubt.

Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree with VirtuosiMedia &#8211; I&#8217;ve seen several different scripts use the Akismet anti-spam API in the past &#8211; it&#8217;s definitely worth a try. It would be far more advanced than a custom spam filter that spammers would find a way around no doubt.</p>
<p>Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Medieval</title>
		<link>http://alexandersarchive.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/spam-words/#comment-336</link>
		<dc:creator>Medieval</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 22:13:42 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexandersarchive.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-336</guid>
		<description>.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tripy</title>
		<link>http://alexandersarchive.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/spam-words/#comment-334</link>
		<dc:creator>Tripy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 20:19:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexandersarchive.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-334</guid>
		<description>Or, rather than simply filter words, you could implement a &quot;naive bayesian filter&quot;.
Wikipedia has an explaination there: http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive_Bayes_classifier
 
A quick google find brought me to this: http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/BayesClassifier.aspx
It&#039;s a bit old, but surely you can adapt the code base to be integrated into yours.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Or, rather than simply filter words, you could implement a &#8220;naive bayesian filter&#8221;.<br />
Wikipedia has an explaination there: <a href="http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive_Bayes_classifier" rel="nofollow">http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Naive_Bayes_classifier</a></p>
<p>A quick google find brought me to this: <a href="http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/BayesClassifier.aspx" rel="nofollow">http://www.codeproject.com/KB/cs/BayesClassifier.aspx</a><br />
It&#8217;s a bit old, but surely you can adapt the code base to be integrated into yours.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: VirtuosiMedia</title>
		<link>http://alexandersarchive.wordpress.com/2008/04/10/spam-words/#comment-332</link>
		<dc:creator>VirtuosiMedia</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 10 Apr 2008 17:11:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://alexandersarchive.wordpress.com/?p=134#comment-332</guid>
		<description>Unless you&#039;re dead set on developing your own spam filter, you could just use the akismet API for .net. It&#039;s available here: http://akismet.com/development/</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Unless you&#8217;re dead set on developing your own spam filter, you could just use the akismet API for .net. It&#8217;s available here: <a href="http://akismet.com/development/" rel="nofollow">http://akismet.com/development/</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
